The widespread adoption of AI tools has brought about tremendous changes in the way international students learn.From writing papers and doing assignments to programming and organizing data, AI has almost become a "standard tool". But at the same time,The regulatory methods of American universities are also being upgraded in tandem.Many students think that "it's okay to just use AI to assist them," but in reality, some seemingly normal operations have already been incorporated into the school's regulations.Key monitoring areas。
1. Generate and submit assignments directly using AI: Most typical high-risk behaviors
The one most prone to problems isAfter completing the assignment using generative AI (such as ChatGPT), submit it directly.Common scenarios include: using AI to generate the entire essay, directly copying the AI output code, and not making any modifications or attributing the source. Many schools have made it clear that...The use of AI must be disclosed.,orThe use of AI in core operational content is explicitly prohibited.。
2. Slightly modified AI content, but without attribution. Another, more insidious type of risk isThe initial draft was generated by AI, and I rewrote it slightly, but I didn't specify the extent of AI involvement.。 What students see as "assistance," may be considered under school rules as...Non-original content without source attributionThis kind of behavior is especially common in writing courses.It may be detected by the system or questioned by the teacher.
3. AI participates in group projects, but the attribution of responsibility is unclear. Group projects are one of the high-risk scenarios for the use of AI.Some membersPartial content generated using AI.Other members were not involved or unaware of the situation, yet the final submission was made as a whole.Deemed to be in violation。 In the American university system, group projects are typically handled under a "collective responsibility" system.This is not a matter of individual separation of responsibility. In other words, you may be affected even if you do not use AI.
IV. The programming assignment used AI assistance but was not explained. This type of situation is particularly common in CS/Engineering courses:Use AI to generate code logic, use AI to debug, or directly copy the optimized code.Many schools have begun using a dual screening method combining code similarity detection and AI detection tools. V. Using AI or opening related pages during the exam More serious situations occur in exam settings, such as...Open ChatGPT during the online exam and switch screens to check the answers.The background system detected access records for AI tools.Even without actually copying content, it may still be considered an attempt to cheat. This article is a user submission and does not represent the views of this website.
The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. Please contact the original author for authorization before reprinting. For any copyright infringement issues, please contact copyright@jaketao.com
